ACDC vs. QRE ETF Comparison

Comparison of ETFS Battery Tech and Lithium (ACDC) to aShares Australian Resources Sector ETF (QRE)
ACDC

ETFS Battery Tech and Lithium

ACDC Description

The Fund will attempt to (before fees and expenses) fully replicate the performance of the Index by investing its assets in a portfolio of securities that comprise the Index in proportion to the weight assigned to each security within the Index. The Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index aims to track the performance of a basket of stocks of companies that are providers of certain electro-chemical energy storage technology (i.e., battery technology) and mining companies that produce metals that are primarily used for manufacturing batteries.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$82.67

Average Daily Volume

12,543

Number of Holdings *

1

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
QRE

aShares Australian Resources Sector ETF

QRE Description QRE aims to track the performance an index (before fees and expenses) comprising the largest ASX-listed companies in the resources sector, including BHP, Rio Tinto, Woodside Petroleum and more.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$7.24

Average Daily Volume

208,470

Number of Holdings *

9

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period ACDC QRE
30 Days 0.88% -3.21%
60 Days 3.70% 5.85%
90 Days 3.64% 3.13%
12 Months 6.85% -3.57%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in ACDC Weight in QRE Overlap
MIN D 3.83% 1.63% 1.63%
ACDC Overweight 0 Positions Relative to QRE
Symbol Grade Weight
ACDC Underweight 8 Positions Relative to QRE
Symbol Grade Weight
BHP A -42.59%
RIO B -8.9%
WDS F -8.76%
FMG C -6.09%
STO D -4.23%
NST A -3.4%
S32 B -3.16%
EVN A -1.69%
Compare ETFs