ACDC vs. QRE ETF Comparison
Comparison of ETFS Battery Tech and Lithium (ACDC) to aShares Australian Resources Sector ETF (QRE)
ACDC
ETFS Battery Tech and Lithium
ACDC Description
The Fund will attempt to (before fees and expenses) fully replicate the performance of the Index by investing its assets in a portfolio of securities that comprise the Index in proportion to the weight assigned to each security within the Index. The Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index aims to track the performance of a basket of stocks of companies that are providers of certain electro-chemical energy storage technology (i.e., battery technology) and mining companies that produce metals that are primarily used for manufacturing batteries.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$96.05
Average Daily Volume
15,523
1
QRE
aShares Australian Resources Sector ETF
QRE Description
QRE aims to track the performance an index (before fees and expenses) comprising the largest ASX-listed companies in the resources sector, including BHP, Rio Tinto, Woodside Petroleum and more.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$7.73
Average Daily Volume
147,908
10
Performance
| Period | ACDC | QRE |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 3.58% | 0.65% |
| 60 Days | 6.88% | 2.25% |
| 90 Days | 13.49% | 1.05% |
| 12 Months | 3.38% | 1.57% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in ACDC | Weight in QRE | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLS | A | 3.84% | 1.88% | 1.88% |
ACDC Overweight 0 Positions Relative to QRE
| Symbol | Grade | Weight |
|---|
ACDC: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
QRE: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
