MVR vs. ACDC ETF Comparison
Comparison of Market Vectors Australian Resources ETF (MVR) to ETFS Battery Tech and Lithium (ACDC)
MVR
Market Vectors Australian Resources ETF
MVR Description
Exposure to the largest and most liquid ASX-listed companies that generate at least 50% of their revenues or assets from the Australian resources sector
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$37.30
Average Daily Volume
26,677
Number of Holdings
*
10
* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
ACDC
ETFS Battery Tech and Lithium
ACDC Description
The Fund will attempt to (before fees and expenses) fully replicate the performance of the Index by investing its assets in a portfolio of securities that comprise the Index in proportion to the weight assigned to each security within the Index. The Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index aims to track the performance of a basket of stocks of companies that are providers of certain electro-chemical energy storage technology (i.e., battery technology) and mining companies that produce metals that are primarily used for manufacturing batteries.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$93.90
Average Daily Volume
16,027
Number of Holdings
*
1
* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
| Period | MVR | ACDC |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 1.66% | 0.05% |
| 60 Days | 4.60% | 4.58% |
| 90 Days | 3.52% | 12.29% |
| 12 Months | -2.48% | 1.62% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in MVR | Weight in ACDC | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLS | C | 4.13% | 3.84% | 3.84% |
MVR Underweight 0 Positions Relative to ACDC
| Symbol | Grade | Weight |
|---|
MVR: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
ACDC: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
