XMET vs. ACDC ETF Comparison

Comparison of Betashares Energy Transition Metals ETF (XMET) to ETFS Battery Tech and Lithium (ACDC)
XMET

Betashares Energy Transition Metals ETF

XMET Description

XMET aims to track the performance of an index (before fees and expenses) that provides exposure to a portfolio of global companies in the Energy Transition Metals (‘ETMs’) industry. ETMs are raw materials that are essential to the transition to a less carbon-intensive economy. XMET provides exposure to global producers of copper, lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite, manganese, silver and rare earth elements.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$8.05

Average Daily Volume

12,688

Number of Holdings *

2

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
ACDC

ETFS Battery Tech and Lithium

ACDC Description The Fund will attempt to (before fees and expenses) fully replicate the performance of the Index by investing its assets in a portfolio of securities that comprise the Index in proportion to the weight assigned to each security within the Index. The Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index aims to track the performance of a basket of stocks of companies that are providers of certain electro-chemical energy storage technology (i.e., battery technology) and mining companies that produce metals that are primarily used for manufacturing batteries.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$92.89

Average Daily Volume

16,007

Number of Holdings *

1

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period XMET ACDC
30 Days 11.81% -0.45%
60 Days 19.97% 4.77%
90 Days 17.18% 11.94%
12 Months -2.33% 1.55%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in XMET Weight in ACDC Overlap
PLS D 5.06% 3.84% 3.84%
Compare ETFs